I recently finished the latest book in my series of biographies about all the kings and queens of England. For the life of Henry IV, who ruled from 1399 to 1413, I picked “Henry IV: The Righteous King” by Ian Mortimer.
This was one of the more interesting and unusual ones I’ve read so far. It’s told as the story of a basically virtuous and admirable guy whose reign is never quite allowed to flourish. He’s as promising a candidate for king as could be wished for, but he spends his 14 years as king running from one internal crisis to another until he finally expires.
Henry starts out as the richest young man in England, heir to the most powerful nobleman short of the king. He makes a name for himself with lots of knightly jousting, crusading with Teutonic Knights, and going on pilgrimage to Jerusalem. But he falls out badly with King Richard II — also a young man, the same age as him, but a bad, unpopular ruler lacking Henry’s steady, good-at-everything competence. Richard temporarily banishes Henry from England, then once he’s gone, he strips him of his inheritance and exiles him for good, leaving Henry with little choice but to risk it all in overthrowing Richard. He sneaks back home and starts making deals and amassing forces. He captures the panicking and ineffective Richard pretty easily and is swept to the throne in an ecstasy of popular support.
Then the gears shift. His reign is immediately swamped with internal revolts, whack-a-mole military campaigns against Scotland and Wales, and lots of annoying back and forth with Parliament. There were consecutive years of crop failure, feeding a rise in lawlessness and disorder throughout the country. All his energy was needed just to keep his head above water. As king he accomplishes virtually nothing of consequence.
Henry’s reign withered away along with his health, and his son, the future King Henry V, increasingly took charge. His main health problem seems to have been some sort of “skin ailment,” which flared up with a “burning” sensation in 1405 and may have been present decades earlier. It developed into a “wasting disease” that basically left Henry a zombified corpse, or so Mortimer makes it seem. Quoting a well-informed medieval Welshman, he writes:
Read more →Henry suffered ‘an infection’ which resulted in ‘festering of the flesh, dehydration of the eyes, and rupture of the internal organs’. … In this ‘festering of the flesh’ it would appear likely that Henry’s skin disease had grown progressively worse, from his burning skin … to a more general degradation of his lower body. … He was an invalid, dependent on others and in agony as his lower body, quite simply, rotted away beneath him.